What did luisa do?

I made this into a separate page so as not to ruin your discussion among your classes. :)

Left as an exercise for the reader: Compare these steps to those we discussed in June in the Working with L1688 analysis.

LDN 425

already discussed in june; will have to copy stuff here. sorry not here yet.

LDN 981

download bcd and pbcd data. likely only to use pbcd, but might as well get bcd now in case i have to reprocess it.

unzip it.

look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess.

run source extraction (i'm using apex and for irac, idl as well). check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does.

color-based selection of YSOs suggests the following candidates (NOTE THAT names are not static, and you should refer to these by their full coordinates until we establish a final real list):

981-01  20 59 39.5  +50 21 24   
981-02  20 59 47.9  +50 14 32   
981-03  21 00 17.3  +50 19 40   
981-04  21 00 17.4  +50 19 40   **
981-05  21 00 37.0  +50 20 58   **
981-06  21 00 46.3  +50 23 45   
981-07  21 00 49.1  +50 15 25   
981-08  21 00 49.5  +50 15 43   
981-09  21 00 54.7  +50 26 17   **
981-10  21 01 20.3  +50 20 08   **
981-11  21 01 42.1  +50 13 05   
981-12  21 01 47.5  +50 18 22   

ones with "**" found in more than 1 CMD, suggests likely YSO?

go get literature. quanz paper leads us to feigelson and kriss paper. feigelson and kriss report only names and finder charts; need to go to 2mass to extract high-quality modern coordinates. use finder chart to reconstruct whch obj and make note of coords and JHK mags. can find all but one based on finder chart, comparing images. got new 2mass coords for all of those:

 \char comment = cleaned-up feigelson & kriss catalog 
 | name           |RA         |Dec        |  
 |                |d          |d          |  
               1  315.511000   50.495400
               2  315.473400   50.537900
               3  315.362247   50.528336
               4  315.304731   50.401846
               5  315.287700   50.361600
               6  315.244400   50.403600
               7  315.184000   50.488800
               8  315.172215   50.495880
               9  315.155700   50.500000
              10  315.134800   50.527100
              12  315.022700   50.437300
              13  315.070701   50.401503
              14  315.136002   50.363911
              15  315.041164   50.352451
              16  315.175594   50.259917
              17  315.182015   50.204971
              18  315.221231   50.271915
              19  315.285914   50.260887
              20  315.355610   50.330031
              21  315.344357   50.360091
              22  315.536100   50.378600

find 9 with counterparts in our images, none of which are disk candidates based on above:

fk15  21 00 09.9  +50 21 09
fk13  21 00 17.0  +50 24 05
fk14  21 00 32.6  +50 21 50
fk 8  21 00 41.3  +50 29 45
fk17  21 00 43.7  +50 12 18
fk18  21 00 53.1  +50 16 19
fk19  21 01 08.6  +50 15 39
fk 4  21 01 13.2  +50 24 07
fk21  21 01 22.7  +50 21 36

haven't made SEDs of any of these yet. will need to make for you the CMDs I used to pick obj above, and to see where the fk objects fall in the same CMDs. soon!

also need to copy here the full photometry i have for these objects. i have it, just haven't copied it here yet, sorry. will want to compare your photometry and mine, as we did for the other cloud in june.