C-WAYS Spring work - Revision history

Piper at 04:03, 6 June 2012

2012-06-06T04:03:48Z

2012-05-22T00:44:01Z

2012-05-21T00:46:50Z

2012-05-10T17:45:49Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T18:26:01Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T17:05:13Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T17:00:37Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T16:56:58Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T16:37:34Z

Papers to discuss

2012-05-06T16:33:42Z

Papers to discuss

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 6 June 2012
Line 286:		Line 286:
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}
		+
		+
		+	=[[Things Students Should Know b4 CalTech]]=

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 <BR>
-== [[Lincoln-Way High School,Frankfort/New Lenox, Illinois]] ==
+*[[Lincoln-Way High School,Frankfort/New Lenox, Illinois]]
-<BR>
+*[[Walter Payton College Prep High School, Chicago, IL ]]
-==[[Walter Payton College Prep High School, Chicago, IL ]]==
+*[[New Philadelphia High School, New Philadelphia, OH ]]
-<BR>
+*[[Reedley College, Reedley, CA]]
-==[[New Philadelphia High School, New Philadelphia, OH ]]==
+*[[Daniel M. Soref Planetarium at the Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI ]]
 =Papers to discuss=

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 = [[C-WAYS source matching work]]=
 [[C-WAYS source matching work]] -- this is an overview of what we need to know, and has some instructions, but no specific tasks doled out.
 =Papers to discuss=

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 I've attempted to make a roughly color-coded grouping of the papers below so that they can be presented in appropriate clumps. There are a LOT of papers to discuss, and I'm trying to make it roughly about the same amount of work per person. Here is the order I propose:
-'''Reading Guide summaries and questions from discussed papers'''
+'''Reading Guide [[Summaries and questions on discussed papers]]'''
 #person1 (JC1) -- '''Lauren''' -- Guieu et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit??

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 I've attempted to make a roughly color-coded grouping of the papers below so that they can be presented in appropriate clumps. There are a LOT of papers to discuss, and I'm trying to make it roughly about the same amount of work per person. Here is the order I propose:
-'''Reading Guide summaries and questions from discussed papers''' [http://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Summaries_and_questions_on_discussed_papers]
+'''Reading Guide summaries and questions from discussed papers'''
 #person1 (JC1) -- '''Lauren''' -- Guieu et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit??

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 6 May 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I've attempted to make a roughly color-coded grouping of the papers below so that they can be presented in appropriate clumps. There are a LOT of papers to discuss, and I'm trying to make it roughly about the same amount of work per person. Here is the order I propose:		I've attempted to make a roughly color-coded grouping of the papers below so that they can be presented in appropriate clumps. There are a LOT of papers to discuss, and I'm trying to make it roughly about the same amount of work per person. Here is the order I propose:
−
−	~~[[Summaries and questions from discussed papers[http://coolwiki.ipac.caltech.edu/index.php/Talk:C-WAYS_Spring_work]]]~~

	#person1 (JC1) -- '''Lauren''' -- Guieu et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit??		#person1 (JC1) -- '''Lauren''' -- Guieu et al 2010, Rebull et al 2011a and 2011b; possibly Johnson et al. 2012 and Rebull et al. 2012, or possibly makes more sense to wait until closer to the visit??