Galaxy Classification - Revision history

Rebull: /* Things to do with these galaxies */

2007-10-31T20:28:25Z

Things to do with these galaxies

Rebull: /* Things to do with these galaxies */

2007-10-31T20:21:01Z

Things to do with these galaxies

Rebull: /* Galaxy archives */

2007-10-31T20:18:19Z

Galaxy archives

Rebull: /* Things to do with these galaxies */

2007-10-31T20:15:51Z

Things to do with these galaxies

Rebull: /* Galaxy archives */

2007-10-31T20:15:20Z

Galaxy archives

Rebull at 20:14, 31 October 2007

2007-10-31T20:14:37Z

Rebull: /* Spitzer's spatial resolution */

2007-10-31T20:07:36Z

Spitzer's spatial resolution

Rebull: /* Things to do with these galaxies */

2007-10-31T20:06:32Z

Things to do with these galaxies

Rebull at 20:05, 31 October 2007

2007-10-31T20:05:31Z

Rebull at 19:47, 31 October 2007

2007-10-31T19:47:02Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *Classify them.  Start by going to [http://galaxyzoo.org/ Galaxy Zoo], learn about galaxy classification, and train your eye on how to recognize shapes of galaxies.  Then you can classify the galaxy you have found in a Spitzer image.
-*Is the classification the same in the infrared as it is in the optical?  Not necessarily! Go to, for example, [http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/titlepage.pl Skyview] and grab an optical image (or from any other wavelength for that matter) and see if you get the same classification.
+*Is the classification the same in the infrared as it is in the optical?  Not necessarily! Go to, for example, [http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/titlepage.pl Skyview] and grab an optical image (or from any other wavelength for that matter) and see if you get the same classification.  If it's different, why is it different?  If it's the same, why is it the same?
 *Are you the first person on the planet to ever think about this galaxy?  Go to [http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ NED, the NASA Extragalactic Database], and search (by position is probably easiest) to see if anyone else has studied this galaxy before.  Did they get the same classification as you did?  What else do they know about this galaxy?  Do you know something now that they don't know?  (Has anyone published anything on Spitzer data yet?)
 *How big is it in pixels, arcseconds, or (if you have a distance to the galaxy from NED) light years (or parsecs)?

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 In this case, you can clearly see spiral arms. Here are some things you can do with galaxies you find in Spitzer images.
-*Classify them.  Start by going to [http://galaxyzoo.org/ Galaxy Zoo], learn about galaxy classification, and train your eye on how to recognize shapes of galaxies.
+*Classify them.  Start by going to [http://galaxyzoo.org/ Galaxy Zoo], learn about galaxy classification, and train your eye on how to recognize shapes of galaxies.  Then you can classify the galaxy you have found in a Spitzer image.
 *Is the classification the same in the infrared as it is in the optical?  Not necessarily! Go to, for example, [http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/titlepage.pl Skyview] and grab an optical image (or from any other wavelength for that matter) and see if you get the same classification.
 *Are you the first person on the planet to ever think about this galaxy?  Go to [http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ NED, the NASA Extragalactic Database], and search (by position is probably easiest) to see if anyone else has studied this galaxy before.  Did they get the same classification as you did?  What else do they know about this galaxy?  Do you know something now that they don't know?  (Has anyone published anything on Spitzer data yet?)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 =Galaxy archives=
-Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer.  (For them, stars are annoying, ignorable interlopers that they catch by accident.)  Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey.  SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.
+Many groups are specifically working to collect Spitzer images of nearby galaxies (e.g., close enough that Spitzer can resolve more than just the nucleus).  (For these teams, stars are annoying, ignorable interlopers that they catch by accident!)  Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey.  SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.
 =Further reading=
 [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..235P Here is a link to Pahre et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 235] talking about classification of galaxies in the infrared.  NOTE THAT this is a real research paper, so it's not sugar-coated at all.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *Classify them.  Start by going to [http://galaxyzoo.org/ Galaxy Zoo], learn about galaxy classification, and train your eye on how to recognize shapes of galaxies.
 *Is the classification the same in the infrared as it is in the optical?  Not necessarily! Go to, for example, [http://skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/titlepage.pl Skyview] and grab an optical image (or from any other wavelength for that matter) and see if you get the same classification.
-*Are you the first person on the planet to think about this galaxy?  Go to [http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ NED, the NASA Extragalactic Database], and search (by position is probably easiest) to see if anyone else has studied this galaxy before.  Did they get the same classification as you did?  What else do they know about this galaxy?  Do you know something now that they don't know?  (Has anyone published anything on Spitzer data yet?)
+*Are you the first person on the planet to ever think about this galaxy?  Go to [http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/ NED, the NASA Extragalactic Database], and search (by position is probably easiest) to see if anyone else has studied this galaxy before.  Did they get the same classification as you did?  What else do they know about this galaxy?  Do you know something now that they don't know?  (Has anyone published anything on Spitzer data yet?)
 *How big is it in pixels, arcseconds, or (if you have a distance to the galaxy from NED) light years (or parsecs)?
 *Does it have any friends nearby?  Galaxies, like stars -- or teenagers -- usually tend to come in groups... where you find one, another one is usually not too far away.  If it has a friend, how far away is it from its friend?  Is there any evidence that the two galaxies are close enough to interact with each other?

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 =Galaxy archives=
-Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer.  Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey.  SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.
+Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer.  (For them, stars are annoying, ignorable interlopers that they catch by accident.)  Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey.  SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.
 =Further reading=
 [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..235P Here is a link to Pahre et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 235] talking about classification of galaxies in the infrared.  NOTE THAT this is a real research paper, so it's not sugar-coated at all.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 31 October 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:

	Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer. Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey. SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.		Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer. Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey. SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.
		+
		+	=Further reading=
		+
		+	[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..235P Here is a link to Pahre et al., 2004, ApJS, 154, 235] talking about classification of galaxies in the infrared. NOTE THAT this is a real research paper, so it's not sugar-coated at all.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 =Spitzer's spatial resolution=
 [[Image:goods.jpg|right]] Despite the example above, where you can clearly see spiral arms in the galaxy, not every galaxy is so lucky.
-In the picture on the right (taken from [http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2004-10/index.shtml this press release]), you can see a (small) patch of sky imaged with Hubble (left) and Spitzer (right).  The original point of this image was to show how phenomenally sensitive Spitzer is - there is a thing in the center of the frame that is not seen by Hubble, but Spitzer clearly shows that it is there.  But there is something else you can learn from this image too.  Look at the upper right of the Hubble image.  See all the variations in size and shape of the galaxies there?  Look at the same region in the Spitzer image.  To Spitzer, they all look the same - similarly sized and shaped blobs.  Spitzer's telescope is small (just 85 cm) and the wavelengths of light Spitzer uses are long (comparatively), so the resolution of Spitzer is limited.   ([[I%27m_ready_to_go_on_to_%22Advanced%22_Topics_in_Infrared_and_the_Spitzer_Telescope.| see the advanced page for more information on resolution and associated issues]].)
+In the picture on the right (taken from [http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2004-10/index.shtml this press release]), you can see a (small) patch of sky imaged with Hubble (left) and Spitzer (right).  The original point of this image was to show how phenomenally sensitive Spitzer is - there is a thing in the center of the Spitzer frame that is not seen by Hubble.  There is something else you can learn from this image too.  Look at the upper right of the Hubble image.  See all the variations in size and shape of the galaxies there?  Look at the same region in the Spitzer image.  To Spitzer, they all look the same - similarly sized and shaped blobs.  Spitzer's telescope is small (just 85 cm) and the wavelengths of light Spitzer uses are long (comparatively), so the resolution of Spitzer is limited.   ([[I%27m_ready_to_go_on_to_%22Advanced%22_Topics_in_Infrared_and_the_Spitzer_Telescope.| see the advanced page for more information on resolution and associated issues]].)
 =Galaxy archives=
 Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer.  Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey.  SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 31 October 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	=Spitzer's spatial resolution=		=Spitzer's spatial resolution=
−	[[Image:goods.jpg]] Despite the example above, where you can clearly see spiral arms in the galaxy, not every galaxy is so lucky.	+	[[Image:goods.jpg\|right]] Despite the example above, where you can clearly see spiral arms in the galaxy, not every galaxy is so lucky.
		+	In the picture on the right (taken from [http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2004-10/index.shtml this press release]), you can see a (small) patch of sky imaged with Hubble (left) and Spitzer (right). The original point of this image was to show how phenomenally sensitive Spitzer is - there is a thing in the center of the frame that is not seen by Hubble, but Spitzer clearly shows that it is there. But there is something else you can learn from this image too. Look at the upper right of the Hubble image. See all the variations in size and shape of the galaxies there? Look at the same region in the Spitzer image. To Spitzer, they all look the same - similarly sized and shaped blobs. Spitzer's telescope is small (just 85 cm) and the wavelengths of light Spitzer uses are long (comparatively), so the resolution of Spitzer is limited. ([[I%27m_ready_to_go_on_to_%22Advanced%22_Topics_in_Infrared_and_the_Spitzer_Telescope.\| see the advanced page for more information on resolution and associated issues]].)
		+
		+	The point of all of this is that some galaxies in the Spitzer images won't look like galaxies. Sometimes Spitzer will just see the nucleus of the galaxy, and sometimes Spitzer's resolution just isn't high enough to distinguish the outer reaches of the galaxy. You will have to go find higher spatial resolution data (often this means optical data) in order to classify the galaxy.
		+
		+
		+	=Galaxy archives=
		+
		+	Many groups are specifically working to collect images of nearby galaxies with Spitzer. Two such teams are [http://sings.stsci.edu/ SINGS, The Spitzer Infrared Nearby Galaxy Survey] and LVL, the Local Volume Legacy Survey. SINGS is the older of the two teams, so they not only have a website, but also have delivered back to the SSC images of their targets in Spitzer and many other wavelengths. [http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/data/SPITZER/SINGS/ Go here] to search the SINGS data.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Image:Pn-gal.jpg|right]]
 =Serendipitous finds=
-Spitzer's cameras have relatively large fields of view (for infrared cameras), and Spitzer is really efficient at covering large areas of sky. Thus, it is often the case that sources are serendipitously imaged -- for example, galaxies caught in the background of an image of something else. You can do science with these objects!
+Spitzer's cameras have relatively large fields of view (for infrared cameras), and Spitzer is really efficient at covering large areas of sky. Thus, it is often the case that sources are serendipitously imaged -- for example, galaxies caught in the background of an image of something else. You can do science with these objects.. science that the original astronomer who got these data is not likely to have done!
-On the right is an example of just such an image.  The picture is meant to be of the planetary nebula in the center ([http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-07/index.shtml original press release]), but the galaxy in the upper right was caught by accident.
+On the right is an example of just such an image.  The picture is meant to be of the planetary nebula in the center ([http://www.spitzer.caltech.edu/Media/releases/ssc2005-07/index.shtml original press release]), but the galaxy in the upper right was caught by accident.  The people who took this picture wanted to study the planetary nebula.  They didn't care about the galaxy in the background.
 =Things to do with these galaxies=