Matching to Spitzer and Weeding the SEDs - Revision history

Rebull: /* BRC34 */

2011-11-16T22:45:53Z

BRC34

Rebull at 17:42, 15 November 2011

2011-11-15T17:42:36Z

Rebull at 17:38, 15 November 2011

2011-11-15T17:38:53Z

Rebull: /* BRC27 */

2011-11-11T22:23:17Z

BRC27

Rebull: /* Checking the photometry */

2011-11-11T22:22:16Z

Checking the photometry

Rebull at 22:20, 11 November 2011

2011-11-11T22:20:30Z

Rebull: /* Checking the photometry */

2011-11-11T22:16:36Z

Checking the photometry

Rebull: /* BRC 34 */

2011-11-10T17:33:22Z

BRC 34

Rebull: /* BRC 34 */

2011-11-10T17:32:00Z

BRC 34

Rebull: /* BRC 34 */

2011-11-10T17:31:09Z

BRC 34

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 ==BRC34==
 *re-checked IRAC, MIPS photometry pending.
-*discovered bright source in the middle was missing off our list. see [[Notes on SEDs from BRC34]] for more details.
 redone catalog, with best, final photometry <font color=red>PENDING</font>

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 15 November 2011
Line 94:		Line 94:
	Now that we have new, hopefully improved Spitzer photometry, and optical data from Haleakala is coming in, we need to make new SEDs including these new/improved points, and reassess the SEDs.		Now that we have new, hopefully improved Spitzer photometry, and optical data from Haleakala is coming in, we need to make new SEDs including these new/improved points, and reassess the SEDs.

		+	=SED analysis=
	Even though you're getting started on fitting lines to the RJ side of the SEDs before this point conceptually, I figure that it kind of belongs here, after we have 'settled' all of the SED points! [[Adding a trend line to SEDs]] from John is now wikified and posted! :)		Even though you're getting started on fitting lines to the RJ side of the SEDs before this point conceptually, I figure that it kind of belongs here, after we have 'settled' all of the SED points! [[Adding a trend line to SEDs]] from John is now wikified and posted! :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 15 November 2011
Line 93:		Line 93:

	Now that we have new, hopefully improved Spitzer photometry, and optical data from Haleakala is coming in, we need to make new SEDs including these new/improved points, and reassess the SEDs.		Now that we have new, hopefully improved Spitzer photometry, and optical data from Haleakala is coming in, we need to make new SEDs including these new/improved points, and reassess the SEDs.
		+
		+	Even though you're getting started on fitting lines to the RJ side of the SEDs before this point conceptually, I figure that it kind of belongs here, after we have 'settled' all of the SED points! [[Adding a trend line to SEDs]] from John is now wikified and posted! :)

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 *[[file:BRC27_photomCheck.xlsx]] Please save your version as BRC27_photomCheck_''state''.xls  (insert your state where indicated). Thanks. --[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 15:54, 21 October 2011 (PDT)
 *spreadsheet compiled with Florida, Illinois, Oregon and Minnesota data. Photometry checked. [[file:BRC27_photomCheckCOMP.xlsx]] --[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 14:18, 9 November 2011 (PST)
-CAUTION - PRIOR IDS NOT UNIFORMLY CORRECT, AND PRIOR FLUX DENSITIES ALSO NOT UNIFORMLY CORRECT.
+CAUTION WITH THOSE FILES - PRIOR IDS NOT UNIFORMLY CORRECT, AND PRIOR FLUX DENSITIES ALSO NOT UNIFORMLY CORRECT. however, coordinates do seem to be right, and the redone photometry generally matches (with each other and with my redone photometry), so the photometry is ok, just the crossids are wrong.
 REDONE CATALOG, with best possible photometry and source guessing: [[file:new+known+opt-brc27-1111-lmr.txt]] and [[file:new+known+opt-brc27-1111-lmrSEDs.pdf]] is the SEDs to go with it. See extensive notes in [[Notes on SEDs from BRC27]] for details on each source. '''CAUTIONS THAT GO WITH THIS FILE:'''
@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 *There are columns for r, i, and MIPS-70 (which are unpopulated -- waiting on r and i, and m70 will never be populated), as well as the 4 WISE bands, which I don't think you've seen before. See [[Central wavelengths and zero points]] for information you need to work with those bands.
 *Objects we are very likely going to drop are indicated with a prepended 'XX' in the 'whyhere' column. Sorry this is not consistent with the BRC34 table below; I don't want to 'officially' drop stuff until we get the optical data.
 ==BRC34==

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 After going through and assessing those SEDs, we needed to check on the photometry for many sources.
-'''BRC27'''
+==BRC27==
 *[[file:BRC27_photomCheck.xlsx]] Please save your version as BRC27_photomCheck_''state''.xls  (insert your state where indicated). Thanks. --[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 15:54, 21 October 2011 (PDT)
 *spreadsheet compiled with Florida, Illinois, Oregon and Minnesota data. Photometry checked. [[file:BRC27_photomCheckCOMP.xlsx]] --[[User:CJohnson|CJohnson]] 14:18, 9 November 2011 (PST)
@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
-'''BRC34'''
+==BRC34==
 *re-checked IRAC, MIPS photometry pending.
 *discovered bright source in the middle was missing off our list. see [[Notes on SEDs from BRC34]] for more details.

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 [[file:new+known+opt-brc34-1110-lmr.txt]] - catalog of optical through MIPS70 for BRC34, including the 'new' source added.  '''BIG CAUTIONS THAT GO WITH THIS FILE:'''
-*SOME LIMITS INCLUDED IN HERE, and not indicated in the header. the limits appear in front of the flux density measurement. If there is a "<" then the true measurement of this source is somewhere below that number, e.g., we did not detect it in that band. NOTE THAT the sense of the limits is reversed. a undetected object will have a true flux density less than the cited number in microJanskys, but a true magnitude greater then a cited number in magnitudes.  As such, the limits are only given in the correct sense for the flux densities, and as such only in front of the flux density measurements, but are meant to be (properly) applied to the rest of the measurements for that band.
+*SOME LIMITS INCLUDED IN HERE, and not indicated in the header. the limits appear in front of the flux density measurement. If there is a "<" then the true measurement of this source is somewhere below that number, e.g., we did not detect it in that band. NOTE THAT, between flux densities and magnitudes, the sense of the limits is reversed because bright objects have big numbers for flux and small numbers for magnitudes. An undetected (faint) object will have a true flux density ''less'' than the cited number in microJanskys, but a true magnitude ''greater'' than a cited number in magnitudes.  As such, the limits in this file are only given in the correct sense for the flux densities, and as such only in front of the flux density measurements, but are meant to be (properly) applied to the rest of the measurements for that band.
 *Spitzer photometry still to be checked and refined, so still original Spitzer measurements in here.
 *There is a MIPS-70 measurement for one object here, which I don't think you've done before. See [[Central wavelengths and zero points]] for the information you need for 70 um.

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 [http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/laher/nitarp/haleakala/ Russ' page on Haleakala data reduction]
-[[file:new+known+opt-brc34-1110-lmr.txt]] - catalog of optical through MIPS70 for BRC34, including the 'new' source added. [[file:new+known+opt-brc34-1110-lmrSEDs.pdf]] is the file of the SEDs that go with this.  '''BIG CAUTIONS THAT GO WITH THIS FILE:'''
+[[file:new+known+opt-brc34-1110-lmr.txt]] - catalog of optical through MIPS70 for BRC34, including the 'new' source added.  '''BIG CAUTIONS THAT GO WITH THIS FILE:'''
 *SOME LIMITS INCLUDED IN HERE, and not indicated in the header. the limits appear in front of the flux density measurement. If there is a "<" then the true measurement of this source is somewhere below that number, e.g., we did not detect it in that band. NOTE THAT the sense of the limits is reversed. a undetected object will have a true flux density less than the cited number in microJanskys, but a true magnitude greater then a cited number in magnitudes.  As such, the limits are only given in the correct sense for the flux densities, and as such only in front of the flux density measurements, but are meant to be (properly) applied to the rest of the measurements for that band.
 *Spitzer photometry still to be refined.
@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 *Objects we are very likely going to drop are indicated in the 'whyhere' column.