Difference between revisions of "Aperture Photometry Overview"
m |
m |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*Howell, S. B., (ed.), 1991, "Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques", ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 23 | *Howell, S. B., (ed.), 1991, "Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques", ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 23 | ||
*Philip, A. G. Davis, (ed.), 1979, "Problems of Calibration of Multicolor Photometric Systems," Dudley Observatory, Schenectady, New York | *Philip, A. G. Davis, (ed.), 1979, "Problems of Calibration of Multicolor Photometric Systems," Dudley Observatory, Schenectady, New York | ||
− | + | *Stetson, P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191 | |
− | + | *Stetson, P. B., 1990, PASP, 102, 932 | |
− | + | *Stetson, P. B., and Harris, W. E., 1988, AJ, 96, 909 | |
− | The basic principle of aperture photometry is to sum up the observed | + | |
− | + | The basic principle of aperture photometry is to sum up the observed flux within a given radius from the center of an object, then subtract the total contribution of the sky background within the same region, leaving only the flux from the object to calculate | |
− | given radius from the center of an object | + | an instrumental magnitude. The aperture size is important, since seeing, tracking, and focus errors affect the amount of flux within the stellar profile. The noise grows linearly with radius as the stellar flux trails off in the wings of the profile. Increasing the size of the aperture will increase the Poisson shot noise of the background sky and any flat field |
− | background within the same region | + | errors that may be nearby The signal-to-noise ratio of the flux measurement reaches a maximum at an intermediate aperture radius shown by Howell (1989). The use of a smaller radius introduces the problem that the fraction of the total flux measured will vary for objects of different flux from image to image. Aperture corrections |
− | + | must be used in this latter case. | |
− | an instrumental magnitude The aperture size is important since seeing | + | |
− | focus errors | + | If you are working with ground-based data, you need to worry about extinction corrections to the data then extinction |
− | |||
− | with radius as the stellar | ||
− | |||
− | the aperture will increase the | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | errors that may be nearby The signal | ||
− | to | ||
− | noise ratio of the | ||
− | |||
− | maximum at an intermediate aperture radius shown by Howell | ||
− | The use of a smaller radius introduces the problem that the fraction of the total | ||
− | |||
− | measured will vary for objects of | ||
− | |||
− | must be used in this latter case | ||
− | If | ||
stars need to be observed and reduced along with the object data The extinction stars | stars need to be observed and reduced along with the object data The extinction stars | ||
should be observed at airmasses corresponding to the range in airmass of the program | should be observed at airmasses corresponding to the range in airmass of the program |
Revision as of 00:30, 15 May 2008
Aperture Photometry
Much of this text was originally ruthlessly copied without permission from the document entitled "Photometry Using IRAF" by Lisa A. Wells, from 1994, found on the IRAF photometry documentation page.
There are many techniques involved in doing aperture photometry and these methods vary from one astronomer to another. Some observers use large apertures for their measurements to account for seeing, tracking, and focus variations, while others use small apertures and apply aperture corrections. The sky algorithm used may vary according to the chip characteristics and the data There are a number of ways to do the standard calibration so be sure to observe standards in a way that is compatible with the calibration package you wish to use.
Space-based data does not have to worry about variations in seeing and focus (generally), and the sky background is a function primarily of the direction in which you are looking. Moreover, space-based data usually arrive on your desktop already calibrated. So, space-based data are much easier to process than ground-based data. However, you still need to use care in selecting your photometry reduction parameters, because it is very easy to shoot yourself in the foot.
Some references on the theory and techniques of aperture photometry are
- Golay, M., "Introduction to Astronomical Photometry," D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht, Holland
- Hardie, Robert H., 1962, in "Stars and Stellar Systems," Vol. 2, "Astronomical Techniques", ed. W. A. Hiltner, University of Chicago Press, 178
- Harris, W. E., 1990, PASP, 102, 949
- Harris, W. E., FitzGerald, M. P., and Reed, B. C., 1981, PASP, 93, 507
- Howell, S. B., 1989, PASP, 101, 616
- Howell, S. B., (ed.), 1991, "Astronomical CCD Observing and Reduction Techniques", ASP Conf. Series, Vol. 23
- Philip, A. G. Davis, (ed.), 1979, "Problems of Calibration of Multicolor Photometric Systems," Dudley Observatory, Schenectady, New York
- Stetson, P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
- Stetson, P. B., 1990, PASP, 102, 932
- Stetson, P. B., and Harris, W. E., 1988, AJ, 96, 909
The basic principle of aperture photometry is to sum up the observed flux within a given radius from the center of an object, then subtract the total contribution of the sky background within the same region, leaving only the flux from the object to calculate an instrumental magnitude. The aperture size is important, since seeing, tracking, and focus errors affect the amount of flux within the stellar profile. The noise grows linearly with radius as the stellar flux trails off in the wings of the profile. Increasing the size of the aperture will increase the Poisson shot noise of the background sky and any flat field errors that may be nearby The signal-to-noise ratio of the flux measurement reaches a maximum at an intermediate aperture radius shown by Howell (1989). The use of a smaller radius introduces the problem that the fraction of the total flux measured will vary for objects of different flux from image to image. Aperture corrections must be used in this latter case.
If you are working with ground-based data, you need to worry about extinction corrections to the data then extinction stars need to be observed and reduced along with the object data The extinction stars should be observed at airmasses corresponding to the range in airmass of the program objects a range of not less than magnitudes in extinction is suggested so that a good airmass correction can be determined and applied to the data Color and zero point corrections are often applied to the instrumental magnitudes as well to put them on the standard system de ned by a set of observed standard stars these same standard stars can also be used as the extinction stars These stars should be chosen prior to observing so that their colors bracket those of the program objects a good rule of thumb is to have at least a magnitude range in the colors of the standards to determine reasonable calibrations See Section for details IRAF currently provides a means of creating polygonal and elliptical aperture lists for use with speci c tasks Elliptical apertures may also be used to perform isophotal surface photometry on galaxies The next section brie y describes the many options