Difference between revisions of "Talk:CG4 Spring work"
From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 35: | Line 35: | ||
− | |||
CG4 might have been a shade for Sa101 to hide behind. Until the | CG4 might have been a shade for Sa101 to hide behind. Until the | ||
Line 50: | Line 49: | ||
*''I agree with this'' | *''I agree with this'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | found seven new YSOs in the area | ||
+ | confirmed one previous YSO | ||
+ | found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) | ||
+ | Found late-type premain sequence stars | ||
+ | |||
*''I disagree with this'' | *''I disagree with this'' | ||
Line 55: | Line 60: | ||
probably continuous (from 8 stars?) | probably continuous (from 8 stars?) | ||
− | |||
*''Why we should care'' | *''Why we should care'' | ||
Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
found seven new YSOs in the area | found seven new YSOs in the area | ||
confirmed one previous YSO | confirmed one previous YSO | ||
− | + | Used some of the same techniques we will | |
+ | Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones | ||
+ | Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters | ||
+ | Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that did have it | ||
Revision as of 21:59, 14 April 2010
For Apr 14:
* KEVIN -- Reipurth and Pettersson 1993 http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1993A%26A...267..439R&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
- Main Point
Looked for YSOs in Gum Nebula (near CG4 and Sa101 and CG13) Used JHK IR photometry (sort of like us) ESO 1m J-H and H-K UBV photometry (like us) ESO 1m Ha spectroscopy CTIO 60/90cm Curtis Schmidt telescope with 6deg prism 1-2hrs Point source spectroscopy ESO 1.52m and 3.6m 3700A to 7000A 10-40 min
Quesitons and Kevin trying to dodge the questions
TiO and MgH using the width and Ha width of line (spinning?) Balmer series forbidden [OI] linesat 6300 and 6363A prominent absorption at 5577A absorbtion trough at 6200A deeper
- High Level Summary
- Most Interesting
Introduction:
Good description of cometary nebulae Good rundown of CG formation theory OB starformed nearby and the UV radiation scrunched and eroded nearby nebula (some evidence in this paper for this method) or SN went off nearby and shockwave scrunched and eroded nearby nebula
CG4 might have been a shade for Sa101 to hide behind. Until the
CG4 evaporation may have started >1,000,000 years ago.
In faint background stars they found stars becoming more prominent as they used longer wavelength filters (good for us)
Spectral class
M3 to K7 M2, M3-4, K7-M0, K7, K2-5, K5, M1-2, K2
- I agree with this
found seven new YSOs in the area confirmed one previous YSO found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) Found late-type premain sequence stars
- I disagree with this
found there are different ages (spectra and movement away from globule) probably continuous (from 8 stars?)
- Why we should care
found seven new YSOs in the area confirmed one previous YSO Used some of the same techniques we will Found YSOs and confirmed previous ones Found faint background stars getting more prominent in longer wavelength filters Not all CG had star formation but CG4 was one that did have it
For Apr 21:
*VIVIAN -- Kim et al 2003 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003csss...12..799K Full Paper link click here. [1]
- Main Point
- High Level Summary
- Most Interesting
- I agree with this
- I disagree with this
- Why we should care
For Apr 28:
*CHELEN -- Kim 2005 http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?2003ASPC..287..275K&data_type=PDF_HIGH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
- Main Point
- High Level Summary
- Most Interesting
- I agree with this
- I disagree with this
- Why we should care
For May 5:
*CAROLYN -- Choudhury and Bhatt 2008 http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0811/0811.4389v1.pdf the ADS entry is http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.393..959C and I downloaded the real journal article for you (easier to read!) here: media:choud.pdf
- Main Point
- High Level Summary
- Most Interesting
- I agree with this
- I disagree with this
- Why we should care