Difference between revisions of "What did luisa do?"
m |
m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=LDN 425= | =LDN 425= | ||
| − | + | discussed in june. | |
| + | |||
| + | download bcd and pbcd data. likely only to use pbcd, but might as well get bcd now in case i have to reprocess it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | unzip it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess. | ||
| + | |||
| + | make some 3-color mosaics. note bright red thing in depths of the stuff that is dark in the optical. note that this is the same object studied by connelley et al. (2007 AJ 133, 1528). no other screamingly obvious objects seen in 3-color mosaic as bright red things. | ||
| + | |||
| + | do photometry, a.k.a. run source extraction (manually on previously known obj, or automatically on everything.) i'm using apex and idl, but APT is also JUST FINE. check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
=LDN 981= | =LDN 981= | ||
| Line 16: | Line 28: | ||
look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess. | look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess. | ||
| − | run source extraction (i'm using apex and for irac, idl as well). check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does. | + | do photometry, a.k.a. run source extraction (i'm using apex and for irac, idl as well, but APT is also JUST FINE). check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does. |
color-based selection of YSOs suggests the following candidates (NOTE THAT names are not static, and you should refer to these by their full coordinates until we establish a final real list): | color-based selection of YSOs suggests the following candidates (NOTE THAT names are not static, and you should refer to these by their full coordinates until we establish a final real list): | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 4 December 2008
I made this into a separate page so as not to ruin your discussion among your classes. :)
Left as an exercise for the reader: Compare these steps to those we discussed in June in the Working with L1688 analysis.
LDN 425
discussed in june.
download bcd and pbcd data. likely only to use pbcd, but might as well get bcd now in case i have to reprocess it.
unzip it.
look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess.
make some 3-color mosaics. note bright red thing in depths of the stuff that is dark in the optical. note that this is the same object studied by connelley et al. (2007 AJ 133, 1528). no other screamingly obvious objects seen in 3-color mosaic as bright red things.
do photometry, a.k.a. run source extraction (manually on previously known obj, or automatically on everything.) i'm using apex and idl, but APT is also JUST FINE. check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does.
LDN 981
download bcd and pbcd data. likely only to use pbcd, but might as well get bcd now in case i have to reprocess it.
unzip it.
look at pipeline produced mosaics. they look fine. no need to reprocess.
do photometry, a.k.a. run source extraction (i'm using apex and for irac, idl as well, but APT is also JUST FINE). check source extraction to make sure photometry makes sense and looks good. it does.
color-based selection of YSOs suggests the following candidates (NOTE THAT names are not static, and you should refer to these by their full coordinates until we establish a final real list):
981-01 20 59 39.5 +50 21 24 981-02 20 59 47.9 +50 14 32 981-03 21 00 17.3 +50 19 40 981-04 21 00 17.4 +50 19 40 ** 981-05 21 00 37.0 +50 20 58 ** 981-06 21 00 46.3 +50 23 45 981-07 21 00 49.1 +50 15 25 981-08 21 00 49.5 +50 15 43 981-09 21 00 54.7 +50 26 17 ** 981-10 21 01 20.3 +50 20 08 ** 981-11 21 01 42.1 +50 13 05 981-12 21 01 47.5 +50 18 22
ones with "**" found in more than 1 CMD, suggests likely YSO?
go get literature. quanz paper leads us to feigelson and kriss paper. feigelson and kriss report only names and finder charts; need to go to 2mass to extract high-quality modern coordinates. use finder chart to reconstruct whch obj and make note of coords and JHK mags. can find all but one based on finder chart, comparing images. got new 2mass coords for all of those:
\char comment = cleaned-up feigelson & kriss catalog
| name |RA |Dec |
| |d |d |
1 315.511000 50.495400
2 315.473400 50.537900
3 315.362247 50.528336
4 315.304731 50.401846
5 315.287700 50.361600
6 315.244400 50.403600
7 315.184000 50.488800
8 315.172215 50.495880
9 315.155700 50.500000
10 315.134800 50.527100
12 315.022700 50.437300
13 315.070701 50.401503
14 315.136002 50.363911
15 315.041164 50.352451
16 315.175594 50.259917
17 315.182015 50.204971
18 315.221231 50.271915
19 315.285914 50.260887
20 315.355610 50.330031
21 315.344357 50.360091
22 315.536100 50.378600
find 9 with counterparts in our images, none of which are disk
candidates based on above:
fk15 21 00 09.9 +50 21 09 fk13 21 00 17.0 +50 24 05 fk14 21 00 32.6 +50 21 50 fk 8 21 00 41.3 +50 29 45 fk17 21 00 43.7 +50 12 18 fk18 21 00 53.1 +50 16 19 fk19 21 01 08.6 +50 15 39 fk 4 21 01 13.2 +50 24 07 fk21 21 01 22.7 +50 21 36
haven't made SEDs of any of these yet. will need to make for you the CMDs I used to pick obj above, and to see where the fk objects fall in the same CMDs. soon!
also need to copy here the full photometry i have for these objects. i have it, just haven't copied it here yet, sorry. will want to compare your photometry and mine, as we did for the other cloud in june.
