Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lynds Target Selection"

From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
== Headline text ==
 +
Hi All,
 +
I've been checking pic's and last reported on LND's and I think these are good selections...not much written on LDN 880. I agree with Rebull that LDN 880. I think we should consider...LDN 1225 next choice. I am looking forward to talking to ya tomorrow. I will have leopard up and coolwiki.
 +
John
 +
--[[User:Schaefers|Schaefers]] 17:52, 20 January 2008 (PST)
 
Dear All
 
Dear All
  

Revision as of 01:52, 21 January 2008

Headline text

Hi All, I've been checking pic's and last reported on LND's and I think these are good selections...not much written on LDN 880. I agree with Rebull that LDN 880. I think we should consider...LDN 1225 next choice. I am looking forward to talking to ya tomorrow. I will have leopard up and coolwiki. John --Schaefers 17:52, 20 January 2008 (PST) Dear All

Sorry about the mess at the bottom. I will email the Excel file

later david Dear All

Ok so I deleted bad formated data below and will try posting the excel file.

later david


Dear Lynds

I hope you all made it home safe and sound.

Wednesday night as I was driving home the sky was GREAT. Very dark and the Milky Way sure stood out. I looked but did not see any nebula. :)

Using http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov I did a search and got a list of Lynds nebula with ra, dec, cloud area in degrees squared and rating of opacity.

I placed list on excel and sorted by opacity and then area.

Hopefully the list will be below for all 6 and 5 lens nebula.

Does any one know about what area we can look at in 1 hour?

later david

name, ra, dec, cloud area (degree squared), area in arcmin squared I think, opacity

LDN 53 17 23 08.90 -23 54 47.2 0.001 3.6 6


--Mcdonald 16:04, 14 January 2008 (PST)   Hi is all goes well this is the excel file:
  Media:ldnlisting.xls