Difference between revisions of "CG4 Proposal"
From CoolWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Talk to you on Wednesday! | Talk to you on Wednesday! | ||
--chj | --chj | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | My Plan to continue Lit. searchm is to finish SIMBAD, then go to ADS and to find a way to confirm and quantify lots! of IR (probably by opacity class) and little UV/max not to exceed a threshold to be determined; don't want the object to be a middle-aged star already. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it the group's intention to consider locations outside of CG4, which could be cluster members? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Mallory|Mallory]] 23:28, 11 January 2010 (PST)Carolyn | ||
Revision as of 07:28, 12 January 2010
Identifiers (aliases) for CG 4 ... BHR 21, Sandqvist 103, FEST 2-30, DCld 259.4-12.7
I found this by typing CG4 into SIMBAD. The results were in the middle of the page. Scrolling down further, there's a list of 20 articles in which CG 4 is mentioned.
Talk to you on Wednesday! --chj
My Plan to continue Lit. searchm is to finish SIMBAD, then go to ADS and to find a way to confirm and quantify lots! of IR (probably by opacity class) and little UV/max not to exceed a threshold to be determined; don't want the object to be a middle-aged star already.
Is it the group's intention to consider locations outside of CG4, which could be cluster members?
--Mallory 23:28, 11 January 2010 (PST)Carolyn
